I was just wondering, it have came to my attention over and over again, why do photographers who take picture of nature, or some really dirty urban or abandoned zone (or even whatever), place a (out of place) naked lady (which at least cause some arrousal) or they dress her in totally unrelated, in real life unwearable clothes, with bunch of acessories (what is mostly confusing in those abandoned places). What the hell is she doing there?!?! It might be normal in portraits (or model something, or pornography (i guess)) but what is the point here, you might as well place there any other random thing like: stator, life vest, repairman (what makes some logic in urban locations) subduction ( random word generator =>
watchout4snakes.com/Creativity… ), what in fact alerady exist, named alternative art or something like that, highly unrelated, and uncomparable with regular (high) art where lady pictures belong, alternatively, randomness and unnaturalness can be observed in so called surreal art.
I know photography is not (however might be) only tool to reflect reality, I highly appreciate many surreal photographs, as well as less realistic but no less astonishing landscapes (plate tectonics are sometimes artistic too), but this phenomena (and it's overnumerousness) is somehow confusing me (won't be first photography topic).
Anyhow, it's almost 7 am, and I'm still reading (and mostly distracting myself from) reading economy, so feel free to respond and troll